Editor Instruction

Peer review plays a critical role in maintaining the quality of academic publishing by ensuring the validity and integrity of research. We highly value the contributions of peer reviewers, who support the publication process and advance research within their respective fields.

 

For those new to the peer review process, it may initially appear challenging. However, peer reviewing is a rewarding endeavor that enables you to contribute to your field while refining your own research and writing skills. The following resources provide guidance on the peer review process and how to craft constructive reviews.

 

Things to consider before you begin a review.

 

Timeliness:
If you anticipate difficulties meeting the deadline, inform the editor immediately. Keep your availability updated in EPH Track to prevent receiving invitations when unavailable.

Suitability:
If you have concerns about your ability to review a submission, consult the journal editor. Ensure you understand your ethical responsibilities as a reviewer.Journal-Specific Guidelines:
Some journals have specific review criteria. Familiarize yourself with these before starting your review.

Confidentiality:
Do not share manuscript content without explicit permission from the journal’s editor. If you suspect ethical misconduct, report it solely to the editor.

Co-Reviewing:
If you wish to collaborate with a colleague or student on a review, notify the journal editor in advance. Further details are available on the Ethics and Responsibility page.